I do review articles for several journals and I see terible reviews from colleagues. I think the quality of the reviews will improve and subsequently the quality of articles. I find unfair that the journals charge the reviewers to get access to those journals where they work basically for free. I think the journals should create more incentives at least to make reviews. For example having full access to the content of the journal, having a editing service for free or having always a discount to publish in the journal. Only few journals do this and it should be generalizable.
I do review articles for several journals and I see terible reviews from colleagues. I think the quality of the reviews will improve and subsequently the quality of articles. I find unfair that the journals charge the reviewers to get access to those journals where they work basically for free. I think the journals should create more incentives at least to make reviews. For example having full access to the content of the journal, having a editing service for free or having always a discount to publish in the journal. Only few journals do this and it should be generalizable.